[Eisfair_dev] lm_sensors (Re: E-1 eisgraph will nicht mit mini_http, beharrt auf apache)
Kay Martinen
kay at martinen.de
Sa Dez 26 23:17:33 CET 2015
Am 26.12.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Marcus Roeckrath:
> Kay Martinen wrote:
>
>> N.B. Das MB sollte auch zumindest einen Temp.Sensor in der CPU haben und
>> einen Monitoring-chip. lm_Sensors findet aber nur die SPD-EEPROMs...
>
> Dazu muss aber auch das lm_sensors-Paket korrekt konfiguriert sein, was
> manchmal etwas tricky ist.
>
> Was sagt sensors?
Detect sagt das hier:
> Press ENTER to continue
> # sensors-detect revision 6284 (2015-05-31 14:00:33 +0200)
> # System: Giga-Byte Technology CO., LTD i440BX-8671 [1.0]
> # Board: Corporation Name i440BX-8671
> # Kernel: 3.2.71-eisfair-1-SMP i686
> # Processor: Pentium III (Katmai) (6/7/3)
>
> This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
> to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
> and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
> unless you know what you're doing.
>
> Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.
> Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no):
> Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No
> VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No
> VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No
> AMD K8 thermal sensors... No
> AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No
> AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No
> AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors... No
> AMD Family 15h thermal sensors... No
> AMD Family 16h thermal sensors... No
> AMD Family 15h power sensors... No
> AMD Family 16h power sensors... No
> Intel digital thermal sensor... No
> Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No
> Intel 5500/5520/X58 thermal sensor... No
> VIA C7 thermal sensor... No
> VIA Nano thermal sensor... No
>
> Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to
> standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
> Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
> Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No
> Trying family `SMSC'... No
> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No
> Trying family `ITE'... No
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
> Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No
> Trying family `SMSC'... No
> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No
> Trying family `ITE'... No
>
> Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces
> through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.
> We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it
> there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such
> interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI
> interfaces? (YES/no):
> Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0... No
> Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8... No
>
> Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.
> We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually
> safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any
> ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (YES/no):
> Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No
> Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No
> Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No
> Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No
>
> Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware
> monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works
> reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble
> on some systems.
> Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no):
> Using driver `i2c-piix4' for device 0000:00:07.3: Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI
>
> Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter at 5000 (i2c-0)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> Client found at address 0x50
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'... No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'... No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Yes
> (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
> Probing for `EDID EEPROM'... No
> Client found at address 0x51
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'... No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'... No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Yes
> (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
> Client found at address 0x52
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'... No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'... No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Yes
> (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
>
> Sorry, no sensors were detected.
> Either your system has no sensors, or they are not supported, or
> they are connected to an I2C or SMBus adapter that is not
> supported. If you find out what chips are on your board, check
> http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices for driver status.
> /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors created successfully
Dies war der 2. Lauf. Diese datei musste ich mit touch auch anlegen weil
er sonst an dieser stelle meckert das sie fehlt und nicht angelegt
werden könnte.
> Vielleicht fehlt ja noch das erforderliche Modul z. B. coretemp ...
Bei einem PIII at 500MHz wohl kaum, oder? ist coretemp nicht für ab
core2duo gedacht? Ich muss das mal mit dem anderen Server vergleichen,
der hat ein Fetteres Board, SMP, Onboard SCSI ist aber sonst wie der
große Bruder von diesem hier. GA-6BXDU gegenüber GA-6BDU wenn ich recht
erinnere....
Kay
--
https://www.linuxcounter.net/cert/224140.png
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Eisfair_dev